MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321489633 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4438

A global analysis of the timing of changes in water extents using Google Earth Engine and Landsat Time Series.

2023· preprint· en· W4321489633 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gustavo Willy Nagel, Stephen E. Darby, Julian Leyland

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Environmental scienceClimate changeWater levelCloud computingFlooding (psychology)Water resourcesChange detectionRemote sensingSurface waterScale (ratio)GeologyComputer scienceGeographyOceanographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coastal and inland surface water resources are affected by complex and overlapping processes such as climate change, droughts, flooding, river damming, coastal expansion, dredging, river meander migration, and so on. The use of satellite-acquired imagery, combined with recent advances in cloud computing, is enabling the monitoring on a global scale of areas where water limits have advanced or receded (Donchyts et al., 2016; Donchyts et al., 2022; Pekel et al., 2016). However, previous studies have not estimated an important aspect: the precise timing at which changes in water extents happened. Here we present preliminary results of an analysis using 38 years of Landsat time series and the cloud platform Google Earth Engine (GEE) in which we monitor areas where water has advanced and receded and the year that this change happened. The developed algorithm detects only permanent changes in water features and thus avoids seasonal or higher-frequency fluctuations caused by short-lived events. The method employs a two-step algorithm. The first step detects areas of permanent change using the Modified Normalized Different Water Index (mNDWI), which effectively detects water and non-water features. In the areas of detected permanent change, the second step uses a Green-Red Normalized Different Water Index (GR_NDWI), which has a smoother value transition from water to land, to identify the year that the change happened. The thresholds of mNDWI and GR_NDWI used to determine if a pixel is water or not were estimated using the Otsu method. Furthermore, an additional novel algorithm was developed to fill in cloud holes in the time series, allowing the monitoring of cloudy regions, such as the Amazon Basin. The final product will be a World Map of the year that the water advanced or receded. A preliminary result for the American continent (excluding Canada) can be visualized in this app: https://gustavoonagel.users.earthengine.app/view/americawaterdetection . The product will be available in a public GEE dataset, for open access use by researchers, governments, and private companies working on oceans, rivers and water lakes, helping to improve water management on a global scale. Donchyts, G., Baart, F., Winsemius, H., Gorelick, N., Kwadijk, J., & van de Giesen, N. (2016). Earth's surface water change over the past 30 years. Nature Climate Change, 6(9), 810-813. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3111Donchyts, G., Winsemius, H., Baart, F., Dahm, R., Schellekens, J., Gorelick, N., Iceland, C., & Schmeier, S. (2022). High-resolution surface water dynamics in Earth’s small and medium-sized reservoirs. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 13776. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17074-6Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., & Belward, A. S. (2016). High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540(7633), 418-422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20584

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207