MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321490165 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4013

Strategies for karst groundwater flow characterization in remote, mountainous, snowmelt-dominated catchments

2023· preprint· en· W4321490165 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sara Lilley, Masaki Hayashi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicKarst Systems and Hydrogeology
Canadian institutionsGeoscience BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowmeltKarstHydrology (agriculture)Groundwater rechargeAquiferGroundwaterGeologySpring (device)Surface runoffGroundwater flowSnowEnvironmental scienceStreamflowGeomorphologyDrainage basinGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Front Ranges of the Canadian Rockies are home to extensive carbonate assemblages that host karst aquifers. New caves and karst springs have recently been discovered in the mountains from Banff, Alberta extending all the way to the United States border, although little research has been conducted on them due to the challenging terrain. In this study, we focus on the Watridge Karst Spring, which is located on a forested hillside in a mountain range that reaches an elevation of 3400 m. This perennial spring can discharge up to 3000 L/s. Karst catchments in these snowmelt-dominated, glacierized areas have sparse vegetation, heavy snowfall, and high hydraulic gradients, leading to efficient groundwater infiltration. As a result, the hydrochemistry of these springs often exhibits strong and rapid fluctuations. The effects of rapid conduit flow are expressed at the Watridge Karst Spring by an increase in discharge followed by a lagged decrease in electrical conductivity (EC), occurring over a diurnal-scale and a longer-scale (e.g., episodic snowmelt or heavy storm). This research aims to use hydrologically relevant metrics to understand the recharge, flow paths, and storage capacity of the aquifer. Particularly, we used signal processing of the fluctuations in discharge, EC and air temperature to estimate groundwater response time, defined here as the lag time between a hydrologic event and a resulting change in hydrochemistry. Response time can be used to approximate celerity in the case of discharge, and velocity in the case of EC. Additionally, automatic water sampling allowed for the observation of rapid changes in major ion chemistry.The results yielded an estimated groundwater conduit velocity on the order of 0.1 m/s that steadily decreases with diminishing flow. It was also found that a distinct shift in the EC signal phase and an associated change in mineral dissolution marks the drainage of an overflow conduit path. This is supported by dye tracer experiments of up to 14 km distance where a maximum velocity of 0.14 m/s has been recorded. Our results show that continuous hydrochemical monitoring of discharge and meteorological conditions at a high-temporal resolution can be used as a first step in characterizing conduit system response. For alpine karst springs with strong hydrochemical fluctuations, this strategy may limit the need to conduct tracer tests involving laborious field work in remote, mountainous locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicKarst Systems and HydrogeologyFrench-language works237,207