MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321490462 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-3707

From soils to clouds - An integrated atmospheric boundary layer observatory in a temperate forest of eastern Canada

2023· preprint· en· W4321490462 on OpenAlexaffabout
Manuel Helbig, Nickerson Nick, Mengering Deklan, Rudaitis Lukas, Ryan Jillian, Benítez-Valenzuela Lidia, Creelman Chance, Taylor Mara

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceAtmosphere (unit)Atmospheric sciencesForest floorSensible heatSoil waterTree canopySnowCanopyMeteorologyGeographyGeologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temperate forests have been shown to substantially impact near-surface climate and atmospheric boundary layer dynamics through a range of complex land-atmosphere feedback mechanisms. For example, forests can reduce water loss to the atmosphere during periods of high vapour pressure deficit, thereby preventing or delaying severe drought impacts. Reducing water loss during periods of high atmospheric water demand comes at the expense of reduced forest productivity and may contribute to additional warming of near-surface air temperatures through increased partitioning of energy to sensible heat. Understanding how land-atmosphere interactions in forested landscapes modify regional and local climate is thus crucial for the design of efficient national and international climate mitigation and adaptation strategies.To better understand complex land-atmosphere interactions in a typical forested landscape of eastern Canada, we have established an integrated atmospheric boundary layer observatory in a temperate forest in New Brunswick, Canada. Observations will be used to quantify environmental, plant physiological, and atmospheric feedbacks and their impacts on near-surface climate. Here, we present the instrumental setup and preliminary results from the integrated observatory. Forest soils are monitored using soil temperature, volumetric soil moisture, soil water potential, and snow depth measurements and are complemented by soil CO2 efflux measurements using forced diffusion chamber systems. Detailed vertical profiles of air temperature and humidity, wind speed and direction, and light are measured from the forest floor to a height of 28 m (i.e., 18 m above the forest canopy) using six weather stations. At the top of the flux tower at 28 m above ground, net ecosystem CO2 exchange and evapotranspiration of the forested landscape is measured using the eddy covariance technique along with longwave and shortwave radiation fluxes. A ceilometer will be added to the observatory in spring 2023 to continuously observe cloud base height and atmospheric boundary layer height. The integrated measurements will produce datasets that can be used to diagnose complex land-atmosphere interactions, to characterise forest microclimate, and to validate coupled land-atmosphere models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics→French-language works237,207→