MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321490524 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-3224

The Sandwich seal systems: A large-scale shaft sealing experiment at the Mont Terri rock laboratory – hydration and monitoring

2023· preprint· en· W4321490524 on OpenAlexaff
Klaus Wieczorek, Katja Emmerich, Rainer Schuhmann, Jürgen Hesser, Markus Furche, Shao Hua, David Jaeggi, Senecio Schefer, José Luis García-Siñeriz, Franz Königer, Juan Carlos Mayor, Simon Norris, Chang Seok Kim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsNuclear Waste Management Organization
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringSeal (emblem)GeologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Safety of deep underground repositories for high-level radioactive waste is ensured by a multi-barrier system consisting of the geological barrier (host rock) and the engineered barrier system (EBS). Shaft seals are a major part of the EBS. The German regulator demands that the interplay of barriers has to be optimized in diverse redundancy to increase reliability and robustness of the barrier system. Shaft seals should also be constructed of diverse redundant components. The design of shaft seals for generic site models of Germany includes hydraulic sealing elements that are to be realized as Sandwich sealing systems. In contrast to conventional hydraulic seals of monolithic bentonite the Sandwich sealing system consists of sealing segments (DS) of bentonites and hydraulically conductive equipotential segments (ES) (Nüesch et al., 2002). Formation water, that is penetrating the hydraulic seal via preferential flow paths is contained in the ES and evenly distributed over the cross section of the seal. Thus, a more homogeneous hydration and swelling of the DS is obtained.In July 2019, after a two-years planning phase (Emmerich et al., 2019), a large-scale experiment was launched at the Mont Terri rock laboratory (MTRL) to demonstrate the feasibility of installation, to investigate the saturation process, to qualify monitoring techniques, and to assess the sealing effectiveness. The in-situ experiment is supported by laboratory experiments at different scales and by numerical simulation.The in-situ experiment consists of two experimental shafts of 1.18 m diameter and 10 ‑ 12.6 m depth located in the sandy facies of the Opalinus Clay. The DS in both shafts are constructed of German Ca-bentonites, while the ES consist of fine-grained sand. Both Sandwich sealing systems are hydrated with Pearson water type A3. Both shafts were drilled in 2020 and Shaft 1 was installed subsequently. Hydration of Shaft 1 started in May 2021. Shaft2 was installed about two years later so that experience from Shaft 1 operation could be included. Additionally, an excavation damaged zone had the chance to develop close to the shaft wall.The presentation will focus on the operation phase of the two shafts. Measurement systems and monitoring results, in terms of the evolution of water content, stress, pore pressure, and relative humidity in the sealing systems will be presented.AcknowledgmentThe Sandwich pre-project and the Sandwich in-situ experiment were/are funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy under contracts 02E11587 and 02E11799.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical and Geomechanical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207