Bibliographic record
Abstract
A number of studies have suggested that dielectric breakdown weathering (“sparking”) may occur on airless bodies in the Solar System. To experience dielectric breakdown, a regolith must be exposed to a sufficiently high fluence of energetic charged particles (>1010 cm-2), and this fluence must be deposited on a timescale less than the regolith’s discharging timescale, which increases with decreasing temperature. Consequently, dielectric breakdown occurs in regolith that is both cold and exposed to high fluxes of solar energetic particles (SEPs) or radiation belt particles. If breakdown occurs, then it causes space weathering by melting and vaporizing microscopic channels through regolith near the surface. We describe our recent experimental, observational, and theoretical work investigating where dielectric breakdown may be an important space weathering process. In the inner Solar System, airless bodies are exposed sporadically to SEP events with high fluences. At 1 AU, the flux of SEPs is nearly isotropic, and thus they may cause dielectric breakdown over the coldest (<120 K) regions of the Moon’s nightside. We present observational evidence for this nightside process and the results of preliminary experiments investigating its microscopic effects. In addition, we briefly discuss the possibility that dielectric breakdown weathering also occurs on Mercury, the moons of Mars, and some asteroids.In the outer Solar System, where the fluxes of SEP events are significantly reduced, dielectric breakdown is more likely to be caused by radiation belts. In particular, moons in Jupiter’s radiation belts are exposed to the highest continuous fluxes of energetic charged particles in the Solar System. Furthermore, Jupiter’s radiation belts have caused dielectric breakdown in spacecraft dielectrics. We describe the range of evidence showing that dielectric breakdown may occur on some of the Galilean moons (Io, Europa, and Ganymede) and Jupiter’s four innermost moons (Amalthea, Thebe, Adrastea, and Metis).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".