MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321490866 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2864

Modelling seabed shear stresses and sediment mobilization on the Scotian Shelf, eastern Canada

2023· preprint· en· W4321490866 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael Z. Li, Yongsheng Wu, Yongxing Ma, Yolanda Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyFisheries and Oceans CanadaGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeabedGeologySedimentOceanographyCurrent (fluid)Continental shelfBenthic zoneTidal currentSediment transportShear stressGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocean surface waves and currents can interact to produce strong seabed shear stress and mobilization of sediments that can significantly impact the seabed stability and benthic habitats on continental shelves. Modelled waves, near-bottom tidal current and circulation current data for a 3-year period were used in a widely applied sediment transport module to simulate the seabed shear stresses and the mobilization of observed sediment grain size on the Scotian Shelf of eastern Canada.The Scotian Shelf is affected by strong waves and tidal currents. These waves, currents and/or their interaction cause maximum mean bed shear velocities of 5 – 10 cm s−1. Observed sediments on the Scotian Shelf can be mobilized by tidal currents at least once during the modelled 3 year period over 28% of the shelf area while waves can mobilize sediments over 60% of the shelf area suggesting much stronger sediment mobilization by waves. Interaction between waves and currents can produce enhanced combined wave-current shear velocity that is capable to mobilize sediments over 74% of the shelf area. The spatial variation of the relative importance of sediment mobilization frequency by component processes was used to classify the Scotian Shelf into six disturbance types. In comparison with previous studies using depth-averaged tidal currents, the present study based on near-bottom tidal currents has resulted in reduced sediment mobilization frequency by tidal currents, smaller extent of high mobility areas and significant changes of the spatial pattern of disturbance type distribution on the Scotian Shelf. The universal Seabed Disturbance Index and Sediment Mobility Index have also been applied to quantify the seabed exposure to physical processes and sediment mobilization on the Scotian Shelf by accounting for both the magnitude and frequency of these processes. The results of this modelling study are important for environmental assessments and for the spatial planning and management of the Scotian Shelf bioregion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→