Investigating the environmental implications of biogas production pathways using life cycle impact assessment model to support regional energy transitions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The regional energy transition requires a growing share of alternative technologies powered by biomass sources,for which not all their environmental impacts have been fully understood yet. The UN and the sustainabledevelopment goal (SDG’s) seven encourage a cleaner, safer and modern energy production for all to upholdenvironmental and climatic protection. This case study aims to apply the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) modelingtool such as the openLCA in assessing wholly (from up to downstream) the environmental, socio-economic andengineering perspectives of energy transitions.The Purpose is to analyze the environmental impacts of maize silage production for biogas production in supportof clean and affordable energy. This means, analyzing the supply chain activities from upstream to the downstreamto obtain the impacts on ecosystem and its services. The objectives of this research are to (a) explore differentbioenergy emission and climate change related problems while finding the tradeoffs across various impacts whenmaize silage is used as feedstock. (b) To discover current natural gas production technology pathways in Alberta,the oil exploration province of Canada and compare them with biogas production impactsThe Method applied is the Eco-indicator 99, E, E method, used in analyzing life cycle impact assessment worst-case scenario of products or services, while comparing the effects with the TRACI & ReCipe methods across board. It provides robust quantitative estimates of GHG emissions, eutrophication, climate impacts, health and land-use impacts of maize silage production for biogas on a regional scale.From the study’s scientific findings, relevant information on the interconnectedness of bioenergy environmentalimpact is generated, which are also useful/applicable for Canada and globally. The result found that the use of highnitrogen fertilizer (above 120 kg/h) contributes to high eutrophication potentials and drying of the maize silagehas high climate change potentials which proves that biogas production from maize silage is not completely cleanbut can be improvedIn conclusion. It concludes that biogas systems can decarbonize regional fossil energy grids, drying of the silagebe carried out in summer with biogas and natural gas mix, and supports the moderate use of farm chemicals tocreate a balance between bioenergy development and environmental prosperity. the project is significant becauseit comprehensively states the need for reduction of excessive emission of greenhousegases, land conversion, and nutrient delivery through biogas production and other energy transition activities thathave the potential to increase global warming, damage water and land resources in Alberta which is scarcely available.KEYWORDS: Energy transition, Environmental impacts, Life cycle impact assessment, Openlca Eco indicator99, biogas production, Sustainable Environmental.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".