MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321493423 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-315

The importance of snowmelt in the water balance of the Toconao sub-basin, Salar de Atacama

2023· preprint· en· W4321493423 on OpenAlexaff
Sonia Valdivielso, Enric Vázquez‐Suñé, Juan Ignacio López‐Moreno, Emílio Custódio, Rotman Criollo, John W. Pomeroy, Ashkan Hassanzadeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowmeltGroundwater rechargeEnvironmental scienceSurface runoffHydrology (agriculture)Water balanceSnowMeltwaterStructural basinGroundwaterInfiltration (HVAC)GeologyAquiferGeomorphologyGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Salar de Atacama basin is one of the best-studied saline endorheic basins in the world due to the delicate balance between extraction of lithium-rich brine from its core, tourism, and the unique ecosystems of its surrounding lagoons. However, no study to date has quantified the contribution of snowmelt compared to rainfall in supporting groundwater recharge in the basin. In this work, satellite information (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, MODIS) is used to characterize the spatial and temporal dynamics of snow coverage. However, snow equivalent water is not available from remote sensing, so the Cold Regions Hydrological Model (CRHM) was used to simulate snow water equivalent, runoff, infiltration and other hydrological processes governing the water balance and groundwater recharge. CRHM makes it possible to link physical processes to hydrological processes using hydrological response units (HRU) as control volumes for water balances and as a means of discretizing the basin. HRU were defined in the Toconao sub-basin, in the eastern part of the Salar de Atacama watershed and CRHM was parameterized from regional hydrological knowledge and run for several years, forced by reanalysis data. Special attention was paid to better understand the energy balance of snow, including sublimation and wind transport ablation losses, soil infiltration processes, and the role of snowmelt in surface runoff generation and direct and indirect groundwater recharge.Satellite observations of snow cover recorded from 2000 to 2020 showed frequent snowfalls both in summer and winter. The greatest extent of snow cover occurred during winter, accounting for 60% of the annual snow-cover extent. Snow cover is generally located above 4500 m asl in summer, while in winter the snow cover is more extensive, covering a large part of the basin. The CRHM simulations show that the greatest amount of precipitation of the year falls as rain in the summer months with the drier winter dominated by snowfall. The intense summer rains produce the greatest annual fluxes of runoff and infiltration. In winter, snowmelt infiltration is approximately twice that from rainfall. Snow losses by wind transport and sublimation had little impact on the overall water balance despite the dry environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→