To Pack or Not to Pack: A Generalized Packing Analysis and Transformation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Packing is an essential loop optimization for handcrafting a high-performance General Matrix Multiplication (GEMM). Packing copies a non-contiguous block of data to a contiguous block to reduce the number of TLB entries required to access it, avoiding expensive TLB misses. When copying data, packing can rearrange elements of the block to decrease the stride between consecutive accesses, improving spatial locality. Until now the use of packing has been limited to handcrafted GEMM implementations and to auto-tuning techniques. Existing loop optimizers, such as Polly and Pluto, either only apply packing to GEMM computations (Polly), or not at all (Pluto). This work proposes GPAT, a generalized packing analysis and code transformation that applies packing, when beneficial, to a generic input loop nest. GPAT is implemented in the Affine dialect of MLIR and evaluated on Polybench/C. GPAT applies packing to benchmarks beyond GEMM and obtains significant speedup compared to current loop optimizers that do not apply packing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it