MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321497626 · doi:10.3390/jfb14030118

Green Biodegradable Polylactide-Based Polyurethane Triblock Copolymers Reinforced with Cellulose Nanowhiskers

2023· article· en· W4321497626 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Functional Biomaterials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCopolymerPolycaprolactonePolyurethanePolymerUltimate tensile strengthChemical engineeringContact anglePolyethylene glycolLactidePolymer chemistryCelluloseComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel series of biodegradable polylactide-based triblock polyurethane (TBPU) copolymers covering a wide range of molecular weights and compositions were synthesized for potential use in biomedical applications. This new class of copolymers showed tailored mechanical properties, improved degradation rates, and enhanced cell attachment potential compared to polylactide homopolymer. Triblock copolymers, (TB) PL-PEG-PL, of different compositions were first synthesized from lactide and polyethylene glycol (PEG) via ring-opening polymerization in the presence of tin octoate as the catalyst. After which, polycaprolactone diol (PCL-diol) reacted with TB copolymers using 1,4-butane diisocyanate (BDI) as a nontoxic chain extender to form the final TBPUs. The final composition, molecular weight, thermal properties, hydrophilicity, and biodegradation rates of the obtained TB copolymers, and the corresponding TBPUs were characterized using 1H-NMR, GPC, FTIR, DSC, and SEM, and contact angle measurements. Results obtained from the lower molecular weight series of TBPUs demonstrated potential use in drug delivery and imaging contrast agents due to their high hydrophilicity and degradation rates. On the other hand, the higher molecular weight series of TBPUs exhibited improved hydrophilicity and degradation rates compared to PL-homopolymer. Moreover, they displayed improved tailored mechanical properties suitable for utilization as bone cement, or in regeneration medicinal applications of cartilage, trabecular, and cancellous bone implants. Furthermore, the polymer nanocomposites obtained by reinforcing the TBPU3 matrix with 7% (w/w) bacterial cellulose nanowhiskers (BCNW) displayed a ~16% increase in tensile strength, and 330% in % elongation compared with PL-homo polymer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it