MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321499163 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/er9py

Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Cloud Computing: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

2023· preprint· en· W4321499163 on OpenAlexaff
Mingxuan Liu, Yan Zhang, Xiaoping Wang, Carrie Y. Peterson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGreen IT and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingGreen computingSustainabilityLife-cycle assessmentComputer scienceData centerGreenhouse gasScalabilityUtility computingEnvironmental impact assessmentEnvironmental economicsEfficient energy useEnergy consumptionCloud testingServerCloud computing securityDatabaseEngineeringOperating systemProduction (economics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud computing has emerged as a popular technology platform that allows businesses to store, access, and process data and applications over the internet. This technology has the potential to reduce costs, increase scalability, and improve efficiency, making it an attractive option for businesses of all sizes. However, as the adoption of cloud computing continues to grow, concerns have been raised about its environmental impact. This has led to the need for an assessment of the environmental sustainability of cloud computing. In this research, we take a life cycle assessment approach to assess the environmental sustainability of cloud computing. The life cycle assessment approach involves the evaluation of the environmental impact of a product or service throughout its entire life cycle, from the extraction of raw materials to the disposal of waste. We apply this approach to cloud computing by analyzing the environmental impact of the hardware, software, and data center infrastructure required to support cloud computing. Our research shows that cloud computing can have a significant environmental impact, particularly in terms of energy consumption and carbon emissions. The hardware required to support cloud computing, such as servers and data storage devices, consumes a significant amount of energy and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the cooling systems required to maintain optimal temperatures in data centers also consume a significant amount of energy. We further identify several strategies that can be implemented to improve the environmental sustainability of cloud computing. These strategies include the use of renewable energy sources to power data centers, the optimization of data center cooling systems, and the use of energy-efficient hardware and software. Our findings highlight the need for businesses and policymakers to consider the environmental impact of cloud computing when making decisions about technology adoption. By implementing strategies to improve the environmental sustainability of cloud computing, businesses can reduce their carbon footprint and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGreen IT and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207