MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321501157 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2396

Geomorphic Effects of Floods – Integrating Ancient, Modern and Experimental Data

2023· preprint· en· W4321501157 on OpenAlexaff
Piret Plink‐Björklund, M Hansford, Haipeng Li, Kenya Ono

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFroude numberGeologyFlood mythBedformSedimentary rockMagnitude (astronomy)Dam failureHydrology (agriculture)Bed loadGeomorphologySediment transportFlow (mathematics)SedimentPaleontologyGeotechnical engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extreme river floods are among Earth’s most common and most destructive natural hazards and thus have a high impact on society. Their impact on shaping the landscapes and the sedimentary record is, however, less clear. The most common assumption is that moderate flood events build the sedimentary record, because (1) the high frequency moderate events are suggested to be more common and thus do more geomorphic work, (2) river recovery feedback loops are suggested to be negative and thus high-magnitude event effects are reworked, and (3) river sedimentary records are assumed to consist of ripple, dune and bar scale cross strata that indicate normal Froude subcritical flow, bedload transport, and equilibrium conditions for downstream bedform migration. However, there is a large and growing body of work that documents river deposits that are dominated by preserved high-magnitude flood deposits that consist of stacked flood event beds rather than equilibrium bedform strata, and indicate formative Froude supercritical flow conditions with suspension transport of sand and gravel.Based on a synthesis of ancient and modern river records, modern river discharge records and experimental data, we propose that there are fundamental differences in magnitude-frequency relationships and relaxation times in rivers with distinct hydrology, such that in some rivers channel recovery may be virtually non-existent and larger floods may leave permanent and formative imprints on landscape. Only if the ratio of the mean relaxation time (normal conditions) to the mean recurrence interval of extreme channel disturbing events is <1, and the critical shear stress for sediment motion is exceeded during moderate (normal) conditions can a river recover from extreme flood-induced change before the next major disturbance occurs. This concept helps to explain the observed variability in the sedimentary record of rivers, as well as critical differences in river flood hazards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes→French-language works237,207→