MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321501475 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-3411

Updated global radioxenon emission inventory from all types of nuclear facilities specific for the year 2014

2023· preprint· en· W4321501475 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Kalinowski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRadioactive contamination and transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceIsotopes of xenonEmission inventoryNuclear powerNuclear engineeringIsotopeMeteorologyNuclear physicsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This presentation summarizes the currently best available estimates of radioxenon emissions from all nuclear facilities for a specific year. It is a unique data set to be used in studies to enhance data analysis from the noble gas component of the International Monitoring System (IMS). Global radioactivity monitoring for the verification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) includes the four xenon isotopes 131mXe, 133Xe, 133mXe and 135Xe. These four isotopes are serving as important indicators of nuclear explosions. The state-of-the-art radioxenon emission inventory uses generic release estimates for each known nuclear facility. However, the release amount can vary by several orders of magnitude from year to year. The year 2014 was selected for a single year radioxenon emission inventory with minimized uncertainty. Whenever 2014 emissions reported by the facility operator are available these are incorporated into the 2014 emission inventory.This presentation summarizes this newly updated radioxenon emission inventory. It comprises all relevant nuclear facilities. For the three strong sources ANSTO (Australia), CNL (Canada), and IRE (Belgium), stack release data with a high time resolution are available. Annual emissions are provided for all other medial isotope production facilities, including new updates for the NIIAR facility (Russia) and the Karpov Institute (Russia). For nuclear power plants (NPP) in Europe and the USA the reported release for the whole year is applied in combination with information about their operational schedule. For all other NPPs the best estimates are used. The estimated releases of nuclear research reactor sources are included as well. For the first time, estimates were made for radioxenon releases from spallation neutron sources and from spent nuclear fuel reprocessing plants. The new emission data are compared with previous studies highlighting discrepancies which in many cases are as large as several orders of magnitude.The global radioxenon emission inventory for 2014 can be used for studies to estimate the contribution of this anthropogenic source to the observed ambient concentrations at IMS noble gas sensors to support CTBT monitoring activities, including calibration and performance assessment of the verification system as described in the Treaty as well as developing and validating methods for enhanced detection capabilities of signals that may indicate a nuclear test. One specific application is the 1st Nuclear Explosion Signal Screening Open Inter-Comparison Exercise that was announced end of 2021 and conducted in 2022. The emission inventory in combination with radioxenon observations at IMS stations may as well be used for global or regional atmospheric tracer studies and for the validation of atmospheric transport simulation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadioactive contamination and transferFrench-language works237,207