MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321504257 · doi:10.1097/pgp.0000000000000946

Cervical Gastric-type Adenosquamous Carcinoma: Case Report of a Rare Neoplasm Associated With a BRCA1 Pathogenic Variant

2023· article· en· W4321504257 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Rajendran, U. McGivern, David González, W. Glenn McCluggage

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdenosquamous carcinomaAdenocarcinomaCervixMedicinePathologyCDKN2ASquamous carcinomaCarcinomaDifferential diagnosisCancerCancer researchOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gastric-type adenocarcinoma is the commonest human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent adenocarcinoma of the cervix. We report a rare case of a primary cervical gastric-type adenocarcinoma with malignant squamous elements (gastric-type adenosquamous carcinoma) in a 64-yr-old female. This is only the third report of a cervical gastric-type adenosquamous carcinoma. The tumor was p16 negative and molecular studies for HPV were negative. Next-generation sequencing showed pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and KRAS , as well as variants of unknown significance in CDK12 and ATM and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/CDKN2B . Pathologists should be aware that not all cervical adenosquamous carcinomas are HPV-associated and the term gastric-type adenosquamous carcinoma is recommended when malignant squamous elements are present within a gastric-type adenocarcinoma. In reporting this case, we discuss the differential and the possible therapeutic options raised by the presence of pathogenic variants in BRCA1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecological PathologySame topicColorectal and Anal CarcinomasFrench-language works237,207