L’évaluation des pupilles : un incontournable pour la pratique infirmière à la salle d’urgence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’examen neurologique est un aspect important de la pratique infirmière en soins critiques. Au sein de cet examen, l’évaluation des pupilles peut fournir des informations vitales chez la personne gravement malade. À la salle d’urgence spécifiquement, les infirmier.ères jouent un rôle déterminant dans l’identification de changements subtils au niveau de la taille, la symétrie, la réactivité pupillaire ou tout autre signe de détérioration neurologique chez la personne nouvellement admise. En dépit de l’importance de l’évaluation des pupilles à la salle d’urgence, il n’existe actuellement aucune norme pour guider cette pratique au sein de la profession infirmière. Le but de cet article est de décrire les composantes essentielles de l’évaluation des pupilles à la salle d’urgence ainsi que les facteurs et troubles neurologiques pouvant l’influencer afin d’outiller les infirmier.ères à l’égard de cette pratique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".