Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Nitrophenols via Ag Nanoparticles Supported on Citric-Acid-Modified Polyaniline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citric-acid-modified polyaniline (P-CA) and P-CA modified with Ag nanoparticles (Ag@P-CA) were prepared via an in situ reduction method. The physicochemical properties of P-CA and Ag@P-CA were compared to unmodified polyaniline (PANI) and PANI-modified Ag nanoparticles (Ag@PANI). Ag@P-CA had a lower content of aniline oligomers compared to Ag@PANI. P-CA and Ag@P-CA had a greater monolayer adsorption capacity for 2-nitrophenol and lower binding affinity as compared to PANI and Ag@PANI materials. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry characterization provided reason and evidence for the higher conductivity of citric-acid-modified materials (P-CA and Ag@P-CA versus PANI and Ag@PANI). These results showed the potential utility for the optimization of adsorption/desorption and electron transfer steps during the electrochemical oxidation of nitrophenols. The oxidation process employs Ag@P-CA as the electrocatalyst by modifying polyaniline with Ag nanoparticles and citric acid, which was successfully employed to oxidize 2-nitrophenol and 4-nitrophenol with comparable selectivity and sensitivity to their relative concentrations. This work is envisaged to contribute significantly to the selective conversion of nitrophenols and electrocatalytic remediation of such waterborne contaminants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".