Variations in exons 11 and 12 of the multi-pest resistance wheat gene Lr34 are independently additive for leaf rust resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Characterization of germplasm collections for the wheat leaf rust gene Lr34 previously defined five haplotypes in spring wheat. All resistant lines had a 3-bp TTC deletion (null) in exon 11, resulting in the absence of a phenylalanine residue in the ABC transporter, as well as a single nucleotide C (Tyrosine in Lr34+) to T (Histidine in Lr34-) transition in exon 12. A rare haplotype present in Odesskaja 13 and Koktunkulskaja 332, both of intermediate rust resistance, had the 3-bp deletion typical of Lr34+ in exon 11 but the T nucleotide of Lr34- in exon 12. Methods: To quantify the role of each mutation in leaf rust resistance, Odesskaja 13 and Koktunkulskaja 332 were crossed to Thatcher and its near-isogenic line Thatcher-Lr34 (RL6058). Single seed descent populations were generated and evaluated for rust resistance in six different rust nurseries. Results: The Odesskaja 13 progeny with the TTC/T haplotype were susceptible with an average severity rating of 62.3%, the null/T haplotype progeny averaged 39.7% and the null/C haplotype was highly resistant, averaging 13.3% severity. The numbers for the Koktunkulskaja 332 crosses were similar with 63.5%, 43.5% and 23.7% severity ratings, respectively. Differences between all classes in all crosses were statistically significant, indicating that both mutations are independently additive for leaf rust resistance. The three-dimensional structural models of LR34 were used to analyze the locations and putative interference of both amino acids with the transport channel. Koktunkulskaja 332 also segregated for marker csLV46 which is linked to Lr46. Rust severity in lines with Lr34+ and csLV46+ had significantly lower rust severity ratings than those without, indicating the additivity of the two loci. Discussion: This has implications for the deployment of Lr34 in wheat cultivars and for the basic understanding of this important wheat multi-pest durable resistance gene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".