Identifying important gene signatures of BMI using network structure‐aided nonparametric quantile regression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We focus on identifying genomics risk factors of higher body mass index (BMI) incorporating a priori information, such as biological pathways. However, the commonly used methods to incorporate prior information provide a model for the mean function of the outcome and rely on unmet assumptions. To address these concerns, we propose a method for nonparametric additive quantile regression with network regularization to incorporate the information encoded by known networks. To account for nonlinear associations, we approximate the unknown additive functional effect of each predictor with the expansion of a B‐spline basis. We implement the group Lasso penalty to obtain a sparse model. We define the network‐constrained penalty by the total norm of the difference between the effect functions of any two linked genes in the known network. We further propose an efficient computation procedure to solve the optimization problem that arises in our model. Simulation studies show that our proposed method performs well in identifying more truly associated genes and less falsely associated genes than alternative approaches. We apply the proposed method to analyze the microarray gene‐expression dataset in the Framingham Heart Study and identify several 75 percentile BMI associated genes. In conclusion, our proposed approach efficiently identifies the outcome‐associated variables in a nonparametric additive quantile regression framework by leveraging known network information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".