Impact of Macrocephaly, as an Isolated Trait, on EEG Signal as Measured by Spectral Power and Multiscale Entropy during the First Year of Life
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Macrocephaly has been associated with neurodevelopmental disorders; however, it has been mainly studied in the context of pathological or high-risk populations and little is known about its impact, as an isolated trait, on brain development in general population. Electroencephalographic (EEG) power spectral density (PSD) and signal complexity have shown to be sensitive to neurodevelopment and its alterations. We aimed to investigate the impact of macrocephaly, as an isolated trait, on EEG signal as measured by PSD and multiscale entropy during the first year of life. We recorded high-density EEG resting-state activity of 74 healthy full-term infants, 50 control (26 girls), and 24 macrocephalic (12 girls) aged between 3 and 11 months. We used linear regression models to assess group and age effects on EEG PSD and signal complexity. Sex and brain volume measures, obtained via a 3D transfontanellar ultrasound, were also included into the models to evaluate their contribution. Our results showed lower PSD of the low alpha (8-10 Hz) frequency band and lower complexity in the macrocephalic group compared to the control group. In addition, we found an increase in low alpha (8.5-10 Hz) PSD and in the complexity index with age. These findings suggest that macrocephaly as an isolated trait has a significant impact on brain activity during the first year of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it