Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This chapter reviews the five propositions that constitute organismic integration theory (OIT). The five propositions address (1) the process of internalization; (2) the distinctions between intrinsic motivation, the different types of extrinsic motivation, and amotivation, and how they relate to each other; (3) the conditions that facilitate internalization of values and behaviors; (4) how behavior that is regulated through more internalized forms of regulation relates to better functioning; and (5) how internalization relates to psychological health and well-being. Also examined are aspects of the theory that have received less attention or that represent emerging trends, such as the contribution of the constructs of integrated regulation and amotivation to SDT’s model of motivation. The chapter argues that OIT provides a framework to explain how society and social contexts affect people’s motivation, as well as what people do in actively adapting to their social worlds. It also sees potential for OIT to expand from the examination of individual human functioning and wellness to understanding how people’s prosocial behaviors and willingness to contribute to others develops and how societies can support this.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".