MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321610250 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268935

Increased uptake of tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) among people living with HIV following the 100-days accelerated campaign: A retrospective review of routinely collected data at six urban public health facilities in Uganda

2023· review· en· W4321610250 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseph Musaazi, Christine Sekaggya‐Wiltshire, Stephen Okoboi, Stella Zawedde‐Muyanja, Mbazi Senkoro, Nelson Kalema, Paul Kavuma, Proscovia Namuwenge, Yukari C. Manabe, Barbara Castelnuovo, Agnes Kiragga

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials PartnershipCenters for Disease Control and PreventionFogarty International CenterNational Institutes of HealthU.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
KeywordsMedicineTuberculosisPoisson regressionPublic healthDemographyRetrospective cohort studyGeeQuarter (Canadian coin)Environmental healthGerontologyPopulationGeneralized estimating equationInternal medicineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) effectively decreases rates of developing active tuberculosis disease in people living with HIV (PLHIV) who are at increased risk. The Uganda Ministry of Health launched a 100-day campaign to scale-up TPT in PLHIV in July 2019. We sought to examine the effect of the campaign on trends of TPT uptake and characteristics associated with TPT uptake and completion among persons in HIV care. We retrospectively reviewed routinely collected data from 2016 to 2019 at six urban public health facilities in Uganda. HIV care database and paper-based TPT registers at six public health facilities in Kampala, Uganda were retrospectively reviewed. Estimated trends of TPT (given as Isoniazid monotherapy) uptake and completion across the 4 years, among PLHIV aged 15 years and above, and factors associated, were examined using Poisson regression model with robust standard errors using generalized estimating equation (GEE) models. On average, a total of 39,774 PLHIV aged 15 years and above were eligible for TPT each calendar year at the six health facilities. Across all 4 years, more than 70% were females (range: 73.5% -74.6%) and the median age ranged from 33 to 34 years. From 2016 quarter one to 2019 quarter two, TPT uptake was consistently below 25%, but, as expected, the uptake significantly increased by about 3-folds from 22.1% to 61.2%, in 2019 quarter two (i.e. before the roll-out of the 100-day accelerated TPT intervention) and quarter three (i.e. after the roll-out of the 100-day accelerated TPT intervention) respectively. This increase remained highly significant even after adjusting for patients' baseline characteristics (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 2.58 [95%CI 2.45, 2.72], P-value<0.001). TPT completion was consistently high at above 70% at most of the time, but, it increased significantly among those initiated during 2018 quarter four and in the subsequent two quarters after the roll-out of the 100-day accelerated TPT intervention (i.e. TPT completion was: 83.2%, 95.3%, and 97.1% among individuals initiated during 2018 quarter4, and 2019 quarters 1 and 2, respectively). The increase in TPT completion during this period remained significant even after adjusting for patients' baseline characteristics (aPR [95%CI] = 1.09 [1.04, 1.14], P value<0.001, and 1.10 [1.05,1.15], P value<0.001, for individuals initiated during 2019 quarter 1, and 2, respectively compared to those initiated during 2018 quarter 4). Not on ART or newly started on ART compared to ART experienced, and pregnant at TPT initiation compared to not pregnant were associated with poor TPT completion, whereas older age (≥25 years versus 15-24 years) was associated with higher TPT completion. The targeted 100-day campaign dramatically increased TPT uptake and completion among PLHIV suggesting a viable catch up strategy to meet WHO guidelines. Future analysis with additional years of data post 100-days TPT intervention is required to evaluate the sustainability of the observed gains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207