Analysis the Effect of Financial Statement Publication on the Stock Performance of PT Bank Syariah Indonesia Tbk. One Year after the Merger
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the country with the world’s largest Muslim population, Indonesia has the potential to lead the Islamic finance industry. Increased public awareness of halal issues, as well as strong stakeholder support, are critical factors in the growth of Indonesia’s halal industry ecosystem. Islamic banks are included. BUMN Banks’ Sharia Banks, namely Bank Syariah Mandiri, BNI Syariah, and BRI Syariah, are no exception, having merged on February 1, 2021. The goal of this study was to see what effect the publication of quarterly financial statements had on the performance of PT Bank Syariah Indonesia’s stock price up to a year after the merger. This study employs secondary data and documentation techniques, with the analysis time period being each quarter in the annual period of 10 days after reporting financial publication reports and 10 days before reporting financial publication reports. Stock prices from that time period, as well as several financial ratios from publicly available financial reports, were used as variables. To test the hypothesis itself, use a ratio scale and the comparative hypothesis method of two paired sample t-tests, as well as the Ryan-Joiner method to test for normality. If the significance value is 0.05 or greater, the data is said to be normally distributed. According to the results of the tests, there were significant differences in BRIS stock prices 10 days before and 10 days after the financial statements were published.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".