MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321638049 · doi:10.1017/9781782044109.001

Preface

2014· other· en· W4321638049 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kai Erikson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourPsychologyVisual artsHistoryArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I have been asked to provide a brief foreword to this collection of chapters: not to introduce the contents of what is to follow but to offer ‘a personal reflective account of working with disasters that can help position their place in human experience’. I was offered this honour because I happen to have spent the past 40 years visiting scenes of disaster and writing about them. At the risk of appearing to open with a mindless personal travelogue, then, l propose to provide a brief sampling of those places – in rough chronological order – as I have on other occasions. A coal mining valley in West Virginia known as Buffalo Creek, where a winter flood, caused by a faulty impoundment, caused a terrifying amount of damage to the people living downstream. An Ojibwa Indian Reserve in Northwest Ontario, Canada, where a mercury spill that had taken place many miles upstream entered the waterways along which the natives had lived, and from which they had drawn sustenance, since the beginning of their reckoning of time. They viewed those waters as a living thing and called the alien substance that had insinuated its way into them ‘pijibowin’, Ojibwa for poison. This shook not only the native economy profoundly but also the native way of life, leaving them with what their wise young chief called ‘a broken culture’. A nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania called Three Mile Island, where a near meltdown resulted in unexpected levels of dread on the part of people who lived in its shadow. By the standards of the time, that reaction appeared puzzling and even ‘irrational’, but it became apparent before long that it was the standards, not the human reaction, that failed the test of reason. A migrant farm worker camp in South Florida, where a large group of numbingly poor migrants from Haiti discovered that the money they had earned working the fields – money their families back home had counted on for everyday survival – had simply been stolen. Native villages along the coasts of Alaska where the seas from which people had extracted their living for centuries had been blackened and polluted for a thousand miles by a gigantic oil spill.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5060.350

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDisaster Management and Resilience→French-language works237,207→