The long‐term outcomes of symptomatic congenital lobar emphysema patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Surgical (OP) management for symptomatic congenital lobar emphysema (CLE) is the standard of care with nonoperative (NOP) approach applied for asymptomatic cases. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes for NOP approach to the care of symptomatic CLE infants. METHODS: A retrospective study of CLE patients treated 2000-2021 at a single institution. Patients with CLE and respiratory symptoms were included. RESULTS: Overall, 23 children had symptomatic CLE, and 12 had NOP management. The median age at diagnosis was 38.5 days (50) in the NOP group versus 25 days (20) in the OP group (p = 0.31). There was no significant difference in the location of the involved lobe, term birth, postnatal diagnosis and gender, and both groups required noninvasive support in 33% of the cases. There was a trend towards higher frequency of oxygen support in the OP group preoperatively (89% vs. 42%, p = 0.07). The median length of stay was 14 days in the NOP group compared to a median postsurgery stay of 7.5 days in the OP group. In follow-up, there was no significant difference in respiratory readmission in first year of life, growth delay, treatment with asthma medication or body mass index in the NOP versus OP group. None of the children in the NOP group required surgery during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A NOP approach for symptomatic CLE infants can have favorable long-term outcomes. Further studies will be required to identify markers to aid in clinical decision-making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".