Signatures of co-evolution and co-regulation in the CYP3A and CYP4F genes in humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 Abstract Cytochromes P450 (CYP450) are hemoproteins generally involved in the detoxification of the body of xenobiotic molecules. They participate in the metabolism of many drugs and genetic polymorphisms in humans have been found to impact drugs responses and metabolic functions. In this study, we investigate the genetic diversity for CYP450 genes. We found that two clusters, CYP3A and CYP4F , are notably differentiated across human populations with evidence for selective pressures acting on both clusters: we found signals of recent positive selection in CYP3A and CYP4F genes and signals of balancing selection in CYP4F genes. Furthermore, unusual linkage disequilibrium pattern is detected in both clusters, suggesting co-evolution of genes within clusters. Several of these selective signals co-localize with expression quantitative trait loci, which suggest co-regulation and epistasis within these highly important gene families. We also found that SNPs under selection in Africans within the CYP3A cluster are associated to CYP3A5 expression levels which are causally associated with reticulocytes count, as established by mendelian randomization. Furthermore, as the CYP3A and CYP4F subfamilies are involved in the metabolism of nutrients and drugs, our findings linking natural selection and gene expression in these gene clusters are of importance in understanding population differences in human health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".