MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321765113 · doi:10.37766/inplasy2023.2.0111

Protocol for a qualitative metasynthesis on response shift.

2023· report· en· W4321765113 on OpenAlexaff
Kara Schick‐Makaroff, Antoinette Davey, Mirjam A. G. Sprangers, Véronique Sebille, Richard Sawatzky, Response Shift in Sync Working Group

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative researchParadigm shiftProtocol (science)Qualitative analysisComputer scienceCode (set theory)PsychologyMedicineSociologyProgramming languageEpistemologyAlternative medicineSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review question / Objective: The aim of this qualitative metasynthesis is to describe and synthesize qualitative response shift studies. We will: 1. describe the studies, including their methods, and 2. synthesize results about response shift. Condition being studied: The qualitative metasynthesis will include all qualitative studies on response shift, irrespective of the condition being studied. The type of health condition that each individual study focuses on (if applicable), will be extracted as a study-level code.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.055
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.073
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0550.073
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.803
GPT teacher head0.714
Teacher spread0.089 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDelphi Technique in ResearchFrench-language works237,207