Multi-Objective Robust Beamforming for Integrated Satellite and Aerial Networks Supporting Heterogeneous Services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An integrated satellite and aerial network (ISAN) is considered a promising candidate to provide seamless connectivity for future wireless communication systems. In this paper, we propose a multi-objective based robust beamforming (BF) scheme for an ISAN to support heterogeneous services with high flexibility, where the satellite network serves various heterogeneous satellite terminals through multicast non-orthogonal multiple access (MC-NOMA), while the aerial network offers services to many internet of things devices using layered division multiplexing (LDM). Specifically, we first formulate a multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP) to achieve a good trade-off between sum rate maximization and total transmit power minimization. To tackle this mathematically intractable problem, we exploit the weighted Tchebycheff approach to transform the MOOP into a single-objective problem. Since only the angular information based channel state information is available, we exploit the angular discretization method and sequential convex approximation to design a robust BF algorithm to obtain the Pareto optimal solutions. Finally, simulation results demonstrated that our proposed scheme can achieve a optimal trade-off between multiple performance metrics with high spectrum and energy efficiency, so as to support heterogeneous services in the ISAN and fill the gap of only single type of serivce in the existing ISAN works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".