MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321780120 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2023.3243034

Transmissibility-Based Fault Detection for Robotic Applications With Time-Varying Parameters

2023· article· en· W4321780120 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdelrahman Khalil, Khaled F. Aljanaideh, Mohammad Al Janaideh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransmissibility (structural dynamics)Control theory (sociology)Bounded functionFault detection and isolationImpulse (physics)Time domainComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisActuatorVibrationPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates transmissibility operators for time-variant systems with bounded nonlinearities. Transmissibility operators are mathematical objects that characterize the relationship between two subsets of responses of an underlying system. The underlying system parameters and nonlinearities are assumed to be unknown. Time-domain transmissibility operators are independent of the system inputs and initial conditions. In this article, we propose an algorithm to identify time-varying transmissibilities using recursive least-squares and noncausal finite impulse response models. The identified transmissibilities are then used for fault detection in three different systems. The first system is an autonomous multirobotic system formulated to emulate connected autonomous vehicle platoons, where the varying parameters are the robot mass and the ground friction coefficient. The second system is a flexible structure with unknown excitation, where the variant parameter is the location of the excitation. Finally, the third system is a robotic manipulator that picks objects with different mass values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207