MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321995899 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10824

Wildfire Threats to Groundwater Supplies: Implications for Pathogen and Particulate Contaminant Transport in Porous Media

2023· preprint· en· W4321995899 on OpenAlexaffabout
Monica B. Emelko, Omar Chowdhury, Xiaohui Sun, Allie Kennington, Philip Schmidt, U. Silins, Micheal Stone

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceGroundwaterWater qualitySurface waterParticulatesBiocharEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental chemistryContaminationWaste managementChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change-associated wildfires are increasing in frequency and severity, causing increasingly variable or deteriorated water quality, and challenging in-plant treatment processes beyond design and operational response capacities, to the point of service disruptions. Recent work has shown that the wildfire impacts on drinking water treatability can extend far downstream and be long-lasting. Notably, very little information regarding the impacts of severe wildfire on groundwater supplies is currently available.Wildfire transforms fuels (i.e. biomass, soil organic matter). Pyrogenic carbonaceous material formed after wildfire includes particulate ash and biochar, which often contains toxic polyaromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins and furans, as well as some heavy metals. These mobile materials may be incorporated into soil profiles (change the soil properties, e.g., hydrophobicity, pH), redistributed, or removed from a burned site by wind and water erosion to source water. While surface water treatment technologies may have some capacity to remove these contaminants from surface water, the subsurface fate and mobility of these toxic particles has not been documented and is not understood. Moreover, the implications of potential changes in dissolved organic carbon on pathogen transport in these systems has not been documented. Because groundwater-based drinking water supplies do not typically require treatment beyond disinfection, it is possible that contaminated particles could enter drinking water wells after wildfire. Moreover, NOM-associated changes in water quality may increase the risk of pathogen transport through the subsurface.Here, the impacts of wildfire on the transport E. coli and Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in various porous media environments (e.g., particle properties, solution chemistry, organic matter character) were evaluated. Column tests were conducted using laboratory prepared wildfire ash-impacted water and wildfire impacted surface water collected after the 2017 Kenow Wildfire in Waterton, Alberta, Canada. These investigation demonstrate that under certain conditions potential post-fire shifts in water quality can substantially enhance particle/microbe transport in porous media, thereby underscoring the need to evaluate microbial risks to groundwater supplies after severe wildfire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→