MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321996106 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10416

Sensitivity Analysis on Sea Surface Drag Parameterization in Storm Surge Modeling

2023· preprint· en· W4321996106 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Feyza Nur Özkan, Martin Verlaan, Sanne Muis, Firmijn Zijl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStorm surgeSurgeExtratropical cycloneEnvironmental scienceStormDragWind stressParametrization (atmospheric modeling)Wind speedClimatologyMeteorologyGeologyOceanographyMechanicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Storm surges can be described as nonperiodic fluctuations in sea levels associated with variations in wind stress and atmospheric pressure, caused by the approach of cyclones or extratropical storms. They can have catastrophic results on coastal communities, particularly in combination with high tides and large waves. Therefore, for the efficiency of storm surge modeling, the accuracy and resolution of meteorological data as well as hydrodynamic processes, which are essentially governed by the atmospheric flow under such strong wind conditions, are particularly crucial. In addition to the accurate forecasts of wind speed, there is uncertainty in translating wind speed to the wind shear stress, which is an essential contributor to storm surges that quantify the driving force of wind to ocean flow using a sea-surface drag in the numerical models.The main purpose of this study is to improve our understanding of the role of sea surface drag parametrization in storm surge dynamics and reproduction within the Global Tide and Surge Model (GTSM). The depth-averaged hydrodynamic model GTSM, which has global coverage and spatially varying resolution increasing towards the coast, can be used to simulate changes in water levels and currents caused by tides and storm surges. In this study, the GTSM is used to compute tide and surge combined to provide accurate tide-surge interactions, and we conduct a sensitivity study of the storm surges to evaluate the performance of various sea surface drag parameterization in predicting storm surge behavior to determine the most suitable one. The model's performance is assessed based on a comparison of modeled and observed storm surges, both being estimated based on tidal analysis of total water levels. We investigate the performance from 2006 to 2022 and analyze 20 specific extreme weather events, such as extra-tropical storm Xaver that occurred over the North Sea and post-tropical cyclone Fiona hit Canada. The results of this study will provide valuable insights into the most suitable sea surface drag parameterization for the prediction of tide-surge interactions, surge signal's mean behavior, and storm surge dynamics within the GTSM under storm conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones ResearchFrench-language works237,207