MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4322001389 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-11459

Tracing Ocean circulation at the AR7W and OVIDE lines using artificial radionuclides

2023· preprint· en· W4322001389 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lisa G. T. Leist, Maxi Castrillejo, J. N. Smith, Marcus Christl, Núria Casacuberta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographyOcean currentWater massArcticClimatologyTRACERGeologyEnvironmental sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Subpolar North Atlantic (SPNA) and Labrador Sea are key regions for deep and intermediate water mass formation and contribute to the southward return flow of the lower limb of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC).The origin and circulation pathways of these water masses can now be studied using the artificial radionuclides 129I and 236U. These tracers are mainly released to the Nordic seas by the European nuclear reprocessing plants of La Hague and Sellafield since the 1960s. This point like source provides a unique fingerprint for Atlantic waters entering the Arctic Ocean and recirculation to the western SPNA.Here we will present results of the distribution of 129I and 236U in the Labrador Sea (AR7W Line) and the SPNA (OVIDE Line). The 129I concentrations and its temporal evolution is studied at 11 stations on a time series that started in 2014. In addition, first results of 236U will also be presented along the AR7W line.At the timeseries the 129I concentration shows a general increase with time and from east to west, reaching its highest concentration in the deep overflow waters and along the Eastern and Western Greenland current.The combination of the well-known tracer 129I with 236U allows to study the origin and mixing of different water masses in the SPNA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→