North Atlantic Drift Sediments Constrain Eocene Tidal Dissipation and the Evolution of the Earth-Moon System.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclostratigraphy and astrochronology are leading methods for determining geologic time. While this technique is dependent on the accuracy of astronomical calculations, the chaos of the solar system limits the confidence of these calculations when applied to ancient periods. High-resolution paleoclimate records, such as those found in Middle Eocene drift sediments from the Newfoundland Ridge (Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Sites (IODP) Expedition 342), offer a unique opportunity to reverse this approach. These sediments, with their high sedimentation rates and distinct lithological cycles, provide an ideal setting for this type of study. However, the stratigraphies of IODP Sites U1408-U1410 are complex and contain several hiatuses. We have overcome this challenge by creating a composite of the two sites and constructing a conservative age-depth model. This has allowed us to create a reliable chronology for this high-resolution sedimentary archive. We have used two different techniques to extract astronomical components (g-terms and precession constant) from proxy time-series, which have produced consistent results. Our study has found that astronomical frequencies are up to 4% lower than those reported in astronomical solution La04. These results provide new constraints on the variability of g-term on million-year timescales, as well as evidence that the g4-g3 "grand eccentricity cycle" may have had a 1.2-Myr period around 41 Ma, instead of its current 2.4-Myr periodicity. Our estimates of the precession constant also confirms previous indications of a relatively low rate of tidal dissipation in the Paleogene. The Newfoundland Ridge drift sediments thus offer a reliable means of reconstructing astronomical components, providing a new target for future astronomical calculations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".