MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4322004697 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9487

Uivak II augen gneiss from the Saglek Block, Labrador: the current state of play

2023· preprint· en· W4322004697 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tanmay Keluskar, Monika A. Kusiak, Daniel J. Dunkley, Martin J. Whitehouse, Simon A. Wilde, Keewook Yi, Shinae Lee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGneissGeologyGeochemistryZirconArcheanProtolithMetamorphismMetamorphic rockGeochronologyMaficPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interpreting Archean geology is often challenging due to the rocks having obscure field relationships and polymetamorphic histories (Kusiak et al. 2019; Dunkley et al. 2020). In such circumstances, U-Pb isotopic analysis of zircon is crucial for revealing the geological history. This study investigates Archean gneisses from the Saglek Block in Canada, which record magmatic and metamorphic history between ca 3.9 Ga and 2.5 Ga. The predominant lithology is the Uivak gneiss which is primarily composed of tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) with subordinate intermediate to mafic components. Uivak gneiss is traditionally divided into Uivak I and Uivak II, where Uivak I is grey gneiss and Uivak II is characterized by augen texture and Fe-rich geochemistry (Collerson and Bridgwater, 1979). Ages for the magmatic protoliths of Uivak I are >3.6 Ga, whereas Uivak II ages vary between ca 3.6-3.3 Ga (Sałacińska et al. 2019; Wasilewski et al. 2021 and references therein). This study presents geochemical and U-Pb zircon geochronology from Mentzel and Maidmonts Islands. Augen gneiss on Mentzel Island fits the definition of Uivak II augen gneiss and yield a U-Pb zircon age of ca 3.3 Ga. A similar age was reported for Maidmonts gneiss (Sałacińska et al. 2019) and Illuilik gneiss (Wasilewski et al. 2021). On Mentzel Island, granitic bodies intruded the augen gneiss at ca 2.7 Ga and 2.5 Ga during high-T metamorphism. New dating confirms that augen gneiss on Mentzel Island and elsewhere in the Saglek Block belongs to Uivak II gneisses of ca 3.3 Ga. Variations in rare earth element concentration between different ca 3.3 Ga rocks can be attributed to the involvement of different crustal components in the magmatic protolith. On Maidmonts Island, the augen gneiss intrudes grey gneiss with a protolith age of ca 3.7 Ga, which confirms deformation and metamorphism of Uivak I gneiss before ca 3.3 Ga. This research was funded by NCN grants UMO2019/34/H/ST10/00619 to MAK. References:Collerson, K.D. & Bridgwater, D. 1979. Metamorphic development of early Archaean tonalitic and trondhjemitic gneisses: Saglek area, Labrador. In: Barker, F. (Ed.), Trondhjemites, Dacites, and Related Rock. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 205–271.Dunkley et al. 2020. Journal of the Geological Society, 177 (1), 31–49.Kusiak et al. 2018. Chemical Geology, 484, 210–223.Sałacińska et al. 2019. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 108, 753-778.Wasilewski et al. 2021. Precambrian Research, 359, 106092.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→