MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4322004708 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10162

Large-scale estimation of surficial sediment size in alpine landforms using UAV photogrammetry and machine learning.

2023· preprint· en· W4322004708 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gerardo Zegers, Álex Garcés, Masaki Hayashi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotogrammetryLandformSedimentGeologyMoraineScale (ratio)Remote sensingGeomorphologyGlacierCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate estimation of surficial sediment size in alpine landforms such as talus slopes, rock glaciers, and moraines is crucial for understanding geomorphologic processes and predicting the potential impact of natural hazards. Traditional methods for measuring sediment size in these environments can be time-consuming and labor-intensive. Additionally, they are usually applied to selected areas and are rarely used to cover larger areas, making the development of more efficient approaches essential. This study presents a new method for estimating large-scale surficial sediment size based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry and combining SediNet and PebbleCountAuto image analysis methods. SediNet is a configurable machine-learning framework for estimating either (or both) continuous and categorical variables from a photographic image of clastic sediment. SediNet can achieve subpixel resolutions because the dimensions of the grains aren't being measured directly. However, site-specific sediment sizes are necessary to train this model. On the other hand, PebbleCountAuto does not require any site calibration by using segmentation methods to delimitate the grains automatically and provide a full grain-size distribution. Our proposed methodology trains the SediNet model using the sediment sizes outputs of the PebbleCountAuto method. Our study area is the upper part of the Lake O'Hara watershed in the Canadian Rockies, composed of talus slopes and a large ice-cored moraine. We performed two types of UAV flights; high-altitude flights (~100 m height) to cover the whole study area with medium-to-high resolution orthomosaic (pixel resolution 3 cm) and low-altitude flights (~25 m height) at smaller patches to achieve high-resolution orthomosaic (pixel resolution 5-8 mm). First, the sediment size was estimated in the high-resolution patches with the PebbleCountAuto method. Then, these results were used to train the SediNet model and generate a large-scale sediment size estimation. Our results show that this combination of methods is a reliable and efficient approach for accurately estimating sediment sizes in alpine landforms. The use of UAV photogrammetry allows for the rapid and cost-effective collection of high-resolution imagery, while the combination of SediNet and PebbleCountAuto provides robust estimates of sediment size over large areas. This new method can improve our understanding of geomorphologic processes and hazard assessment in these environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications→French-language works237,207→