MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322011453 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-11108

Droplet Growth and Its Impact on Visibility During Freezing Fog Events from CFACT

2023· preprint· en· W4322011453 on OpenAlexaff
Onur Durmus, Ismail Gültepe, Zhaoxia Pu, Sebastian W. Hoch, Eric R. Pardyjak, A. Gannet Hallar, Alexi Perelet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisibilityLiquid water contentFogRelative humidityEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesAir temperatureCold weatherChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Freezing fog is a type of cold fog that forms when the air temperature (Ta) is below 0℃. Although Ta is below 0℃, the water droplets can remain in a liquid state rather than freezing. Freezing-fog conditions can pose a significant hazard to aviation and marine operations because it can reduce visibility severely, and ice accumulates rapidly on the surfaces such as aircraft, ship, and roads. Observations collected during the CFACT (Cold Fog Amongst Complex Terrain) Project from 7 January – 24 February, representing cold-fog events over Heber Valley of Utah, are used in the analysis. The objectives of this study are to characterize freezing fog microstructure in detail with respect to droplet size distribution, critical diameter related to activation, and visibility. In the analysis, freezing fog (FZFG) and droplet size spectra will be examined theoretically and experimentally. The droplet activation and critical diameter forming in frozen-fog droplets will be revealed using the Köhler curve. The effect of the droplet-growth process on visibility changes for two cold-fog cases is examined and results are discussed. Preliminary analysis suggests that freezing-fog droplet growth strongly depends on environmental conditions, including Ta, relative humidity (RH), and liquid water content (LWC) as well as droplet number concentration (Nd). It is concluded that microphysical parameterizations should investigate freezing-fog droplet formation and growth in more detail because presently it is lacking in NWP predictions. 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.361
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207