MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322101246 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2023.0053

Je chemine avec Nancy Huston. Entretiens menés par Sophie Lhuillier par Nancy Huston et Sophie Lhuillier

2023· article· fr· W4322101246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrice J. Proulx

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyExpansiveArt historyAmbivalenceArtIdentity (music)Subject (documents)HumanitiesSociologyPsychoanalysisPsychologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Je chemine avec Nancy Huston. Entretiens menés par Sophie Lhuillier par Nancy Huston et Sophie Lhuillier Patrice J. Proulx Huston, Nancy et Sophie Lhuillier. Je chemine avec Nancy Huston. Entretiens menés par Sophie Lhuillier. Seuil, 2021. EAN: 978-2-02-146127-5. Pp. 144. Comprised of an in-depth series of conversations with author Nancy Huston, this volume is part of a collection created explicitly as a way of introducing readers to the life choices and personal trajectories of a variety of professionals including, among others, astrophysicist Hubert Reeves, designer Agnès B., landscape gardener Gilles Clément, and singer-songwriter Angélique Kidjo. Editor and interviewer Sophie Lhuillier points out that, although the books are primarily geared towards a young adult readership, all those "qui ont l'audace de continuer à se questionner en grandissant" (4) would find them valuable. Each one is organized in similar fashion, beginning with information on the series itself followed by a short biography of the interviewee, an expansive section in which Lhuillier poses compelling questions relating to the subject's childhood years, pathways and challenges in later life and how these were addressed, a brief closing entitled "Trois questions à méditer chemin faisant," and a useful list of works by the respective author. In Huston's case, Lhuillier starts off with queries designed to evoke the author's thoughts on her own identity, eliciting a response reflecting Huston's ambivalence at the idea of being circumscribed by classifications linked to nationality, religion, age, marital status, etc., as she remarks that "j'aime à répondre: 'je suis mon chemin,' à la fois suivre et être, bien sûr" (12). Huston later makes manifest that, in order to give voice to her fictional characters, she must first "cesser d'exister," affirming that "Partout ailleurs j'existe: comme objet du regard, sujet de discours, maman, copine, amante, etc. Ici, afin que mes personnages puissent advenir, je dois absolument m'effacer" (128). In addition to intimate reflections on her writing process, Huston also discusses some of the most significant events of her formative years, including her mother's departure when the author was six, the significance reading subsequently held for her "comme échappatoire, comme refuge" (21), and her transition from the years lived in Canada and the United States to a life lived almost exclusively in French following a pivotal decision to study in Paris. For her, this constituted a liberating "deuxième naissance" (44), as she chose to leave behind her maternal language for nearly twenty years. Throughout the wide-ranging conversation, numerous topics relating to the primary thematics of Huston's novels are broached: artistic creation, procreation, history and memory, justice, the environment, and the beauty and necessity of storytelling. For example, speaking of the way in which literature has commonly been taught in schools, she laments that "on n'enseigne presque jamais la littérature en ce qu'elle peut exercer notre muscle moral, nous éveiller à l'empathie, à la curiosité de l'autre" (145). Huston feels strongly that fictional works can serve as powerful vehicles for encouraging a true understanding [End Page 276] and compassion for others. Overall, this well-conceived and edited volume illuminates Huston's individual trajectory and provides a welcome companion to her textual production; it should be of great interest to scholars in fields such as French and francophone literature and culture and Women's and Gender Studies. [End Page 277] Patrice J. Proulx University of Nebraska Omaha Copyright © 2023 American Association of Teachers of French

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3020.136

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207