Numerical simulation of a sedimentation tank applied to an open loop Ground Heat Exchanger system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ground Heat Exchanger (GHE) used with heat pumps have the potential to lower energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. In particular, Standing Column Well (SCW), which is a category of GHE that uses groundwater has the heat transfer medium, is more compact and less expensive than conventional closed-loop GHEs. SCWs are usually coupled with an injection well to enhance the advection process and the overall efficiency during peak power period. Due to the sediment load present in groundwater, water reinjection tends to clog the aquifer, making it less permeable, and in the worst case, leading to undesirable overflows. To avoid this problem, the use of a sedimentation tank placed before the injection well is investigated. To assess the feasibility of this solution, a fully coupled numerical model has been developed based on standard SCW conditions and on laboratory analysis performed on sediments. The fluid dynamics and settling processes have been coupled and simulated with the Mixture model at a constant temperature. Results show that a conventional sedimentation tank can reduce the sediment concentration in the groundwater returned to the aquifer for different flow rate conditions. As the temperature has a major impact on the sedimentation process, a coupled Heat transfer Mixture model simulation was developed to analyse the response of the tank efficiency for a range of typical SCW operating conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".