Variations of the CO2 fluxes and atmospheric CO2 in multi-model predictions with an interactive carbon cycle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variable fluxes of anthropogenic CO2 emissions into the land and the ocean and the remaining proportion in the atmosphere reflect on the global carbon budget variations and further modulate global climate change. A more accurate reconstruction of the global carbon budget in the past decades and a more reliable prediction of the variations in the next years are crucial for assessing the effectiveness of climate change mitigation policies and supporting global carbon stocktaking and monitoring in compliance with the goals of the Paris Agreement.In this study, we investigate reconstructions and predictions of the CO2 fluxes and atmospheric CO2 growth from ensemble prediction simulations using 5 Earth System Model (ESM) - based decadal prediction systems. These novel prediction systems driven by CO2 emissions with an interactive carbon cycle enable prognostic atmospheric CO2 and represent atmospheric CO2 growth variations in response to the strength of CO2 fluxes into the ocean and the land, which are missing in the conventional concentration-driven decadal prediction systems with prescribed atmospheric CO2 concentration.The reconstructions generated by assimilating physical ocean and atmosphere data products into the prediction systems are able to reproduce the annual mean historical variations of the CO2 fluxes and atmospheric CO2 growth. Multi-model ensemble means best match the assessments of CO2 fluxes and atmospheric CO2 growth rate from the Global Carbon Project with correlations of 0.79, 0.82, and 0.98 for atmospheric CO2 growth rate, air-land CO2 fluxes, and air-sea CO2 fluxes, respectively. The CO2 emission-driven prediction systems with an interactive carbon cycle still maintain the predictive skill of CO2 fluxes and atmospheric CO2 growth as found in conventional concentration-driven prediction systems, i.e., about 2 years for the air-land CO2 fluxes and atmospheric CO2 growth, the air-sea CO2 fluxes have higher skill up to 5 years. The ESM-based prediction systems are capable to reconstruct and predict the variations in the global carbon cycle and hence are powerful tools for supporting carbon budgeting and monitoring, especially in the decarbonization processes. Furthermore, we investigate the contribution of uncertainty in the predictions of CO2 fluxes and atmospheric CO2 growth rate from internal climate variability, different model responses, and emission-forcing reductions to identify the prominent challenge in limiting the skill of CO2 predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".