MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322209830 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-14884

Spatially-resolved emulations of droughts and fire weather using MESMER-X

2023· preprint· en· W4322209830 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yann Quilcaille, Lukas Gudmundsson, Sonia I. Seneviratne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicClimate change impacts on agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceClimate changeClimate modelMeteorologyClimatologyEmulationIndex (typography)Computer scienceGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate extremes are among the most impactful consequences of climate change. Moreover, droughts and fires may also hinder envisioned solutions to mitigate climate change, by reducing the efficiency of bio-energies with carbon capture storage and afforestation. Though, investigating such issues would benefit from a tool allowing fast computation of spatial climate extremes, for coupling to other models and exploration of scenarios. Here, we present an approach for emulating such extremes that are based on extensions of the spatially-resolved climate model emulator MESMER-X. In particular, we consider four annual indicators of the Canadian Fire Weather Index and the annual mean soil moisture derived from the Climate Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 for training and emulation. To emulate these indicators, we consider extensions to the framework that include the Gaussian and the Poisson distributions, non-linear evolutions of the parameters of the distribution and lagged effects. We show that the emulator reproduces the trajectories and the statistics of these annual indicators for fire weather and droughts accurately. By doing so, we show that the theoretical framework of MESMER-X can be applied for a large number of annual indicators of climate extremes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change impacts on agricultureFrench-language works237,207