Aseismic rupture on rate-weakening faults before slip instability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nucleation of earthquakes relies on an interfacial instability that facilitates the transition of a slow fault slip to a faster dynamic rupture. Here, we highlight the scenarios when (rate-weakening) interfaces exhibit a phase of slow aseismic rupture—before slip instability—that propagate large distances compared to the usual nucleation sizes. This aseismic rupture propagation results from rate-weakening interfaces' response to reach a state of steady sliding when forced to slip below steady-state frictional conditions. We numerically simulate the slip cycle—aseismic rupture, instability, and dynamic rupture—driven by prototype loading configurations:Slip dislocation accrues at a constant rate at one end of a finite fault with the other end (a) at the free surface of an elastic half-space and (b) completely locked (buried) in an elastic full-space. Imposed slip dislocation accruing at a constant rate on both ends of a finite fault A localized distribution of shear traction that increases at a constant rate. All the above loading conditions can permit a slow aseismic rupture along the fault when the fault is initially locked: a state of interfacial slip for which the frictional strength, at the current slip rate, is significantly less than the steady-state frictional strength at the same slip rate. The slow rupture occurs in all the above loading configurations when the fault is initially locked; the subsequent transition to instability, or not, shows a fault-size dependence for configurations 1a and 1b, even when the fault exceeds the usual nucleation sizes. The cut-off fault size that permits instability after aseismic rupture also depends on the friction parameters, the extent of initial contrast from steady-state sliding, and slip conditions towards which aseismic rupture progresses. The remaining loading configurations exhibit instability whenever the fault size exceeds the usual nucleation sizes. Further, we find that slow rupture’s transition to early-stage instability happens through an intermediate breathing (spatiotemporal oscillation) type evolution of slip rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".