A Novel Computational Procedure for the Waiting-Time Distribution (In the Queue) for Bulk-Service Finite-Buffer Queues with Poisson Input
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss the waiting-time distribution for a finite-space, single-server queueing system, in which customers arrive singly following a Poisson process and the server operates under (a,b)-bulk service rule. The queueing system has a finite-buffer capacity ‘N’ excluding the batch in service. The service-time distribution of batches follows a general distribution, which is independent of the arrival process. We first develop an alternative approach of obtaining the probability distribution for the queue length at a post-departure epoch of a batch and, subsequently, the probability distribution for the queue length at a random epoch using an embedded Markov chain, Markov renewal theory and the semi-Markov process. The waiting-time distribution (in the queue) of a random customer is derived using the functional relation between the probability generating function (pgf) for the queue-length distribution and the Laplace–Stieltjes transform (LST) of the queueing-time distribution for a random customer. Using LSTs, we discuss the derivation of the probability density function of a random customer’s waiting time and its numerical implementations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".