Effect of budesonide on pulmonary activity of multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 assessed with PET imaging in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1/ABCC1) is a highly abundant efflux transporter in the lungs, which protects cells from toxins and oxidative stress and has been implicated in the pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cystic fibrosis. There is evidence from in vitro studies that the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide can inhibit MRP1 activity. We used positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 6-bromo-7-[11C]methylpurine ([11C]BMP), which is transformed in vivo into a radiolabeled MRP1 substrate, to assess whether intratracheally (i.t.) aerosolized budesonide affects pulmonary MRP1 activity in rats. Three groups of rats (n = 5–6 each) underwent dynamic PET scans of the lungs after i.t. aerosolization of either [11C]BMP alone, or [11C]BMP mixed with either budesonide (0.04 mg, corresponding to the maximum soluble dose) or the model MRP1 inhibitor MK571 (2 mg). From PET-measured radioactivity concentration-time curves, the rate constant describing radioactivity elimination from the right lung (kE,lung) and the area under the curve (AUClung) were calculated from 0 to 5 min after start of the PET scan as measures of pulmonary MRP1 activity. Co-administration of MK571 resulted in a pronounced decrease in kE,lung (25-fold, p < 0.0001) and an increase in AUClung (5.3-fold, p < 0.0001) when compared with vehicle-treated animals. In contrast, in budesonide-treated animals kE,lung and AUClung were not significantly different from the vehicle group. Our results show that i.t. aerosolized budesonide at an approximately 5 times higher dose than the maximum clinical dose leads to no change in pulmonary MRP1 activity, suggesting a lack of an effect of inhaled budesonide treatment on the MRP1-mediated cellular detoxifying capacity of the lungs. However, the strong effect observed for MK571 raises the possibility for the occurrence of transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions at the pulmonary epithelium with inhaled medicines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".