Memory Conscious Machine Learning Method to Extract Time-of-Flight Data From Flash LiDARs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This letter presents a memory-conscious architecture for single-photon-avalanche-diode (SPAD) light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems to extract time-of-flight (ToF) information by learning the distribution of incoming photons' ToF to reduce the I/O bandwidth required by flash LiDAR digitizers. Such LiDAR systems can be sensitive to single photons, which makes them an excellent choice for both short- and long-range applications. However, counting and processing every photon means that the sensor front-end generates a massive amount of data to be processed in each frame. The proposed architecture will tackle this challenge by learning the incoming photons' distribution on-chip using mini-batches of time-stamped data from time-to-digital converters. Hence, only learned parameters need to be transferred off-chip instead of the raw data to re-create the histogram. We demonstrate the feasibility of this model in a Monte Carlo simulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".