MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322616857 · doi:10.1002/mds.29363

Brain and Systemic Inflammation in De Novo Parkinson's Disease

2023· article· en· W4322616857 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Talene A. Yacoubian, Yu-Hua Fang, Adam Gerstenecker, Amy W. Amara, Natividad Stover, Lauren Ruffrage, Christopher Collette, Richard Kennedy, Yue Zhang, Huixian Hong, Hongwei Qin, Jonathan McConathy, Etty Benveniste, David G. Standaert

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineParkinson's diseaseMontreal Cognitive AssessmentInflammationInternal medicineCognitive declineCognitionDementiaSystemic inflammationTranslocator proteinDiseasePsychiatryNeuroinflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective To assess the presence of brain and systemic inflammation in subjects newly diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (PD). Background Evidence for a pathophysiologic role of inflammation in PD is growing. However, several key gaps remain as to the role of inflammation in PD, including the extent of immune activation at early stages, potential effects of PD treatments on inflammation and whether pro‐inflammatory signals are associated with clinical features and/or predict more rapid progression. Methods We enrolled subjects with de novo PD (n = 58) and age‐matched controls (n = 62). Subjects underwent clinical assessments, including the Movement Disorder Society‐United Parkinson's Disease rating scale (MDS‐UPDRS). Comprehensive cognitive assessment meeting MDS Level II criteria for mild cognitive impairment testing was performed. Blood was obtained for flow cytometry and cytokine/chemokine analyses. Subjects underwent imaging with 18 F‐DPA‐714, a translocator protein 18kd ligand, and lumbar puncture if eligible and consented. Results Baseline demographics and medical history were comparable between groups. PD subjects showed significant differences in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living, Scales for Outcomes in PD autonomic dysfunction, and MDS‐UPDRS scores. Cognitive testing demonstrated significant differences in cognitive composite, executive function, and visuospatial domain scores at baseline. Positron emission tomography imaging showed increased 18 F‐DPA‐714 signal in PD subjects. 18 F‐DPA‐714 signal correlated with several cognitive measures and some chemokines. Conclusions 18 F‐DPA‐714 imaging demonstrated increased central inflammation in de novo PD subjects compared to controls. Longitudinal follow‐up will be important to determine whether the presence of inflammation predicts cognitive decline. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement DisordersSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207