Kinematics signature of a giant planet in the disk of AS 209
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Observations of dust in protoplanetary disks with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) are revealing the existence of substructures such as rings, gaps, and cavities. This morphology is expected to be the outcome of dynamical interaction between the disks and (embedded) planets. However, other mechanisms are able to produce similar dust substructures. A solution to discriminate the gap formation mechanism is to look at the perturbation induced by the planet on the gas surface density and/or the kinematics. In the case of the disk around AS 209, a prominent gap has been reported in the surface density of CO atr ~100 au. A further gas gap was identified atr~ 200 au. Recently, a localized velocity perturbation was reported in the12COJ= 2−1 emission along with a clump in13COJ= 2−1 at nearly 200 au and this was interpreted as a gaseous circumplanetary disk. In this paper, we report a new analysis of ALMA archival observations of12CO and13COJ= 2−1 in AS 209. We detected a clear kinematics perturbation (kink) in multiple channels and over a wide azimuth range in both datasets. We compared the observed perturbation with a semianalytic model of velocity perturbations due to planet-disk interaction. Based on our analysis, the observed kink is not consistent with a planet at 200 au, as this would require a low gas-disk scale height (<0.05) in contradiction with the previous estimate (h/r ~0.118 atr= 100 au). When we fix the disk scale height to 0.118 (atr= 100 au), we find instead that a planet at 100 au induces a kinematics perturbation similar to the one observed. The kink amplitude in the various channels implies a planet mass of 3–5MJup. Thus, we conclude that a giant proto-planet orbiting atr~ 100 au is responsible for the large-scale kink as well as for the perturbed dust and gas surface density previously detected. The position angle of the planet is constrained to be between 60° and 100° (east of north). The 200 au gap visible in the12COJ= 2−1 moment zero map is likely due to density fluctuations induced by the spiral wake. Future observations using the high-contrast imaging technique in the near- and mid-infrared (e.g., with JWST and/or VLT/ERIS) are needed to confirm the presence and position of such a planet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".