MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322626935 · doi:10.29080/pmhrs.v1i1.1135

Quarter-Life Crisis in Generation Z Adults

2023· article· en· W4322626935 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of International Conference on Psychology Mental Health Religion and Sprirituality · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Learned helplessnessPsychologyFeelingFriendshipActive listeningPanicDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyAnxietyPsychotherapistPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quarter-life crisis is a stage of emotional crisis that occurs in individuals in their 20s including feelings of helplessness, isolation, self-doubt, and fear of failure. Meanwhile, generation Z or iGen refers to the generation that is in the period between 1995-2010 which can also be called iGeneration, net generation, or internet generation. Generation Z or iGen has special characteristics regarding the quarter-life crisis and shows different behavior when facing the quarter-life crisis. Early adulthood itself is a time of shifting from an egocentric view to an empathetic attitude. The purpose of this study is to reveal the description of the quarter-life crisis in early adults of Generation Z or iGen. This research is descriptive qualitative research. Interviews are used as a method of extracting data on one informant. The results of this study are the subjects experience frustration when they cannot motivate themselves, panic over pressure from the family environment and social suspicion, experience helplessness when listening to music that is listened to as if it follows their life, and the inability to multitask. in their social life. have a purpose in life because they are haunted by an uncertain future, and unhappiness because the subjects is unsure of their partner and other problems related to opposite-sex relationships to friendship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it