MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322632524 · doi:10.1130/spe560

Geology of a Large Intact Extensional Oceanic Arc Crustal Section with Superior Exposures: Cretaceous Alisitos Arc, Baja California (Mexico)

2023· book· en· W4322632524 on OpenAlexaff
Cathy J. Busby, Rebecca Morris, Susan M. DeBari, Sarah Medynski, Keith Putirka, Graham D.M. Andrews, Axel K. Schmitt, Sarah Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America eBooks · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersUniversity of California, DavisNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyCalderaOutcropPlutonCretaceousPlutonismVolcanoSillSilicicBack-arc basinVolcanic arcPaleontologyTectonicsSeismologyGeochemistrySubduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Rosario segment of the Cretaceous Alisitos arc (Baja California, Mexico) is arguably the best-exposed structurally intact and unmetamorphosed oceanic arc crustal section on Earth. The gently tilted, 50-km-long section exposes the transition from upper-crustal volcanic rocks to mid-crustal plutonic rocks, formed in an extensional environment. This book presents a detailed geologic map, based on an exhaustive data set including geochemistry, geochronology, and annotated outcrop photos and photomicrographs. Subsegments within the Rosario segment include a subaerial edifice, a volcano-bounded basin, and a fault-bounded basin, each underpinned by separate plutons. The entire data set is integrated across these subsegments in a time slice reconstruction of arc evolution and the relationships between plutonism and volcanism. The data set provides constraints on the evolution of silicic calderas and tectonic triggers for caldera collapse, caldera resurgence by emplacement of sill complexes and by incremental growth of plutons, and comparison with velocity profiles in modern arcs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America eBooksSame topicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207