MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322718697 · doi:10.1684/ejd.2022.4380

Efficacy of combining erbium:YAG and fractional CO2 laser for the treatment of facial scarring

2022· article· en· W4322718697 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Dermatology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatologic Treatments and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineScarsVascularitySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Laser intervention is increasingly recognized as an effective approach to preventing scars, however, as lasers of different wavelengths reach different target tissues, an appropriate combination of laser treatment is required. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of combining erbium: yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) 2,940-nm laser and fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) 10,600-nm laser for the treatment of facial scarring. Materials & Methods: Medical records of 39 patients with facial scars were retrospectively reviewed. Treatments initiated within six months post-injury were defined as "early-intervention", whereas those initiated >six months post-injury were defined as "delayed-intervention". Patients' scores on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were collected and compared between different timepoints using the paired t-test. Improvement in pigmentation, height, vascularity and pliability was analysed between baseline and after final treatment. Results: Between March 2020 and March 2022, 39 patients underwent dual-laser therapy at our laser clinic. The average number of treatments was 4.69 1.54; 18 patients in the early-intervention and 21 patients in the delayedintervention group. Facial scars significantly improved after the first treatment in the delayed-intervention group (p < 0.001), however, there was no significant improvement until two sessions were completed in the early-intervention group (p < 0.001). In the delayed-intervention group, improvement in vascularity was insignificant (p = 0.083), however, improvement in height and flexibility was prominent (p < 0.001). In the early-intervention group, facial scars improved in all four dimensions of VSS (p < 0.05), with improvement of vascularity being the most significant. Side effects were self-limited, and complications were not noted. Conclusion: The combination of Er:YAG and fractional CO2 laser is a safe and effective therapeutic modality for facial scarring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it