Nogais of the Azov region as an example of the imperial policy on the sedenterization of nomadic societies at the end of the 18th – 60s of the 19th century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article researches the transition of Nogai nomadic societies, transferred by the supreme cen-tral authorities of the Russian Empire at the end of the XVIII century from the Pre-Caucasian and Pre-Kuban prairies to the Melitopol district of the Taurida region to a settled state. This article reveals the climatic, socio-economic and political factors influencing the successful process of transition of nomadic societies into a settled state at the beginning of the XIX century. Particular attention is paid to the role of the central and regional apparatus of state authorities on the trans-formation of traditional forms of life, everyday life and economic sectors of the Nogais and the period of their adaptation to the general imperial realities. The author draws attention to the suc-cessful results of the sedentarization of nomadic Nogais implemented by the Russian administra-tion in the first quarter of the XIX century cannot be assessed unambiguously, because of the mass exodus of Nogais living in the Tauride province to the Ottoman Empire in the 60s of the XIX cen-tury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".