MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322730024 · doi:10.1017/9781846159794.005

Acton Place Demolished 1825 and 1960

2010· other· en· W4322730024 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLand Rights and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstateSituatedArchaeologyHistoryGeographyArtGenealogyAncient historyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ACTON PLACE, SITUATED FOUR MILES NORTH-EAST OF SUDBURY, is best remembered for its connection with the Jennens family for whom in the 1720s a substantial house was built but never completed. In 1708 Robert Jennens had acquired Acton Place with an estate of 200 acres from the Daniel family, which had owned two manors in the parish since the first part of the sixteenth century but of whose house no record now remains. Jennens, who died in 1725/6, was a member of a Midlands family, his father being, reputedly, Humphrey Jennens, a very prosperous Birmingham ironmaker, of Erdington Hall in Warwickshire. Robert Jennens was succeeded by his son, William, who was baptised in 1701 and was a godson of King William III. He lived until 1798. William had an Exchequer annuity of £3,000 a year but lived as if penurious, reputedly occupying three rooms in the basement although the family apartments in the house had been furnished before he succeeded to the estate. It is said that he left £2.5 million, with £19,000 in notes being found in the house on his death and a bank balance of £50,000. Allegedly the richest commoner in England, he died intestate without leaving any record of his family, giving rise to speculation that the Robert Jennens who built Acton Place was neither the son of Humphrey Jennens nor the father of William. Litigation ensued as to the rightful heirs to his estate, but eventually in 1816 Acton Place passed to the Hon. Richard William Penn Curzon who was created Earl Howe in 1821. ‘THE LARGE dwelling house with offices built by Mr Jennings [ sic ] near Stowmarket’ was designed by James Gibbs but had not been finished by the time of Robert Jennens's death. His son never completed it, the staircase and one wing, which was to have been a ballroom, being left unfinished. The house has been described as ‘magnificent country seat, which for the grandeur of its hall, and the massive elegance of its marble chimney pieces, as well as the beauty of its stables and other offices was totally unrivalled in that part of the country’. It is depicted in the painting of the entrance front (illustration 1) as having a central block of eleven bays with the two outer sections of two bays each divided by pilasters and the central three bays pedimented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLand Rights and ReformsFrench-language works237,207